江语晨
发表于3分钟前回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
丁天牧
发表于2分钟前回复 :东京的吉祥寺一带,绿意昂然,安静怡人,时间仿佛停滞。这个关于爱的故事就发生在这里。小岛麻子(小泉今日子 饰)是个单身的女性漫画家,居住在吉祥寺,由于赶稿而忽略了爱猫沙巴的身体,导致爱猫因病死去而不自知。自责的她处于静默的情绪中,无法再画出漫画。身为她助手的直美(上野树里 饰)担心小岛麻子的状况,直至麻子在宠物店被一只小猫吸引,取名“咕咕”,重新振作。在吉祥寺的公园里,咕咕追逐母猫,人们欣赏樱花,天地万物自然地共处一起,实习医生青自(加濑亮饰)闯入了麻子的生活,当生活的趣味遍布四周时,麻子的身体却出现状况……自少女时代起就立志画出令人感觉幸福的漫画的麻子,真正寻找到属于自己的幸福了吗?“咕咕”这个名字也许是她的最佳回答。