《蓝衣士兵》是一部1970年的修正主义西部片,香蕉线取材于印第安人战争期间发生于美国科罗拉多州的沙溪大屠杀事件,香蕉线被广泛认为是在隐喻美国在越南的战争罪行。影片讲述一名美军士兵与一位通晓印第安人文化的白人女子在大西部的遭遇。二人成为了美军屠杀印第安人事件的目击者与亲历者。
《蓝衣士兵》是一部1970年的修正主义西部片,香蕉线取材于印第安人战争期间发生于美国科罗拉多州的沙溪大屠杀事件,香蕉线被广泛认为是在隐喻美国在越南的战争罪行。影片讲述一名美军士兵与一位通晓印第安人文化的白人女子在大西部的遭遇。二人成为了美军屠杀印第安人事件的目击者与亲历者。
回复 :You wake up in a shabby hotel room with no idea how you got there. You can’t recall your name. You discover there seem to be other young women in other rooms in the same predicament, though one of them seems to know your name: Anne. After an unpleasant encounter with a rather large cockroach, you have a screaming fit. That’s when the nurses arrive to sedate you. And by the way, when night falls, you’ll need to escape from a killer demon with the bloodied head of a deer.Faces of Anne relies heavily on elements of the slasher film – and in many ways, that’s exactly what it is. But the film is also a puzzle, whose central question – Why is Anne here? – allows us to explore theories as to its solution until the very last moment. Are we inside a video game? An escape room? The mind of someone with multiple personalities? The elaborate and nihilistic fantasy of a deranged serial killer? It’s nothing new to remark that the best horror films are often those that reflect the fears of society; this film builds a clever – and viscerally terrifying – analogy of some of the difficulties faced by today’s young people.源自:https://iffr.com/en/iffr/2023/films/faces-of-anne
回复 :OUR GODFATHER is a feature-length documentary about Tommaso Buscetta, the first high-ranking Italian mafia boss ever to turn against Cosa Nostra. Buscetta helped convict more than 400 Mafiosi. He became the Mob's most wanted man in the world - and 11 members of his family were killed. "He was the most important, protected and endangered witness in US criminal history" The film tells - for the first time- the Buscetta story with exclusive access to his family, which is breaking its silence after 30 years in hiding.
回复 :Inspired by W.G. Sebald’s book and based on WWII archive footage, the film puts forward the question: is it morally acceptable to use civilian population as a means of war? Is it possible to justify mass destruction for the sake of higher “moral” ideals? The question remains as relevant today, as it was 80 years ago, and its urgency is tragically manifested in the current events.