年年岁岁花相似，午夜岁岁年年月弄人，午夜阿琳与阿芳自小在澳门一角长大，芳在琳父之餐馆工作。大陆青年阿华抵澳投靠琳父成为跑堂伙计，竟爱上大小姐琳，以致一夜情生。性格开朗的芳虽对华倾心，未几却发现琳已与华有超友谊关系，二人遂反目。华后来航海他往，误传出事，音信全无，未知琳已珠胎暗结，怀有身孕；无助之际芳摒弃成见，找来迟熟的阿基作琳之丈夫，企图胡乱摆平这件事。琳虽然与基结婚，却饱受相思之苦。基与琳由怜生爱，基终于排除羞怯之心，向琳道出爱意。在华音讯杳然，而基亦真心苦恋之余琳在准备作出抉择，怎料造物弄人，华亦在此时航海归来，其后众人才知真相……其实让人留念的不是地方,而是人。在中秋之夜，琳终于盼回了苦苦思念的华，才月圆人团圆。
回复 :Patrick Messina是一名专利律师，在他的专业领域他有着极高的权利及威望。然而他却被诊断出患了不治之症，这无疑是晴天霹雳。在面对他的最后一名顾客时，他得知这名顾客是一个医生，来自西西里岛，在那里有一颗生长了上百年的橄榄树，这棵树的叶子可以治百病。为了寻找到这棵树，也为了验证传说的真实性，Patrick踏上了旅程。包治百病的百年老树究竟是科学的谜题还是圣经中古老的传说？面对人生的疑惑与信仰，也为了探寻从前，现在以及过去的关系，Patrick不断前行着……
徐靖博
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
回复 :1863年7月1日，十五万名士兵在命运安排下，相会于美国的盖兹堡；他们各自为了理想中的民主政治抛头颅洒热血。结果，有三分之一的人倒于寂静的麦田中；他们的生命创造了南北战争的转折点，这场战役是历史上的盖兹堡大战。
