群芳楼是紫城的有名的舞馆，高结一到晚上盛况空前。尤其是台柱子齐灵，高结一支孔雀舞艳压群芳。紫城有名的酒商顾鸣浩慕名前来，在观赏完齐灵的舞姿后，竟然暴毙在群芳楼。探长洪天和钱多多侦察后排除了他杀的可能。但顾家老二顾鸣滔认为顾鸣浩死得蹊跷，认为同是紫城酒商的沈千山和自己三弟顾鸣泊有重大嫌疑。沈千山过寿，包下群芳楼捧施柔做第一舞姬，就在当晚，顾鸣滔被一支孔雀翎射中，也死在了群芳楼。而后不久，齐灵也遭人绑架，命悬一线……经过调查，洪天终于揭开了谜底。凶手是齐灵，但顾鸣浩的的确确是死于心脏病。她的目标只有顾鸣滔，因为四年前，她被醉酒的顾鸣滔……
回复 :故事发生在上个世纪70年代英国统治下的香港，万天鹰因为有英国人做靠山，横行霸道逼良为娼，铁记饭店老板娘铁姐（徐冬冬饰）带领手下员工小豹子（谢苗饰）等人对峙恶势力，为老公复仇，最终还香港和平与安宁
回复 :影片基本还原了《The Apology(苏格拉底自辩篇)》和《Crito(克里托篇)》。剧的后半段，苏格拉底和雷托辩论的那场戏是原文的删减版，基本涵盖了自辩篇的重要思想。一. 反驳“腐蚀青年人的思想”的罪名二.反驳“无神论者”罪名以及关于“他最有智慧”和对于死亡的看法。可是在判决死刑后，与帮助其逃狱的好友克利托的对话却少了一大截，不过影片到了结尾，更多应该渲染苏格拉底的死前氛围，而不是以高谈阔论来破坏悲剧气氛。
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
