剧情简介
影片定位为家庭伦理片，长靴讲述七 旬老人徐振东因儿子徐卫不来探望自 己，长靴把儿子告上了法庭，法院判决徐卫 每周要拿出一小时对徐振东进行陪护。 对父亲做法不满的徐卫只好按法院判决 执行的故事，进而演绎出一幕幕令人啼 笑皆非的喜剧，让人在笑声之余深思、 感动。
长靴的视频
影片定位为家庭伦理片，长靴讲述七 旬老人徐振东因儿子徐卫不来探望自 己，长靴把儿子告上了法庭，法院判决徐卫 每周要拿出一小时对徐振东进行陪护。 对父亲做法不满的徐卫只好按法院判决 执行的故事，进而演绎出一幕幕令人啼 笑皆非的喜剧，让人在笑声之余深思、 感动。
赵壮赫
回复 :女特工艾米拉在执行一项任务时受挫被停职，回家之后又发现家里突遇变故，爸爸被杀妈妈被绑。为了追查线索救出妈妈，艾米拉和男友杰森开始到处追查线索，但 却处处遭遇莫名杀手，陷入重重危机。在他们终于以为有了线索的时候，却不知道他们其实已经陷入了一场更为恐惧的生化危机……
回复 :故事发生在1936年的布达佩斯。匈牙利总理的棺椁从德国被运了回来，而他想把匈牙利变成一个法西斯国家的梦想暂时也与他一同入土。调查罪犯的记者齐斯蒙德·戈登心里却装着其它事情。一个蛛丝马迹让他在城市一个破烂的街区找到了一个犯罪现场，一位美丽的、穿着讲究的年轻女人被杀，身上只有一本犹太祷告书······为了调查这个谋杀案，戈登进入到了一个充满色情作家、妓院、共产主义牢房的世界，而且这些又与权力的高层有联系。人们越是想把他吓走，他便挖地越深。在调查中，他不知道该相信谁，更不知道到底是什么势力一直跟他作对，试图掩盖事实。
回复 :Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
