郑钧
发表于6分钟前回复 :剧情简介:穷书生赵伟文与邻居程素华青梅竹马,共订白头。文上京赴考,高中状元,圣上为媒,要他娶陈尚书之女月华。榜眼杜文通对月痴心一片,求文不要夺爱。文实不愿娶月,奈何圣旨难违,遂于成亲当日佯装疯癫,尚书惟有暂延婚事。文音讯全无,素偕养父寿伯上京寻文,获悉文将成尚书女婿,暗中随陈府老仆进府见文,文誓言永不负爱。惟素与月相貌酷肖,文一时难辨,闹出不少误会。原来二人是自幼失散的孪生姊妹。最后,骨肉团聚,虽月与素皆不是尚书大人所出,但夫人把两人等同亲生,共享荣华。文与素喜成鸾凤,通与月亦共结佳偶。更多外文片名:Gang gu ye导演:龙图 Tu Long编剧:龙图 Tu Long演员表:任剑辉 Kim Fai Yam ....赵伟文罗艳卿 Yanqing Luo ....程素华、陈月华李海泉 Hoi-Chuen Lee ....寿伯郑君绵 Cheng Kwan Min ....杜文通任冰儿 Binger Ren ....小荷马笑英 Xiaoying Ma ....陈夫人黎雯 Man Lai ....伟文母张志荪 Chi Suen Cheung ....财叔张生 Sang Cheung ....陈尚书摄影 Cinematography:黄捷 Hung Chieh剪辑 Film Editing:宋明 Ming Sung美术设计 Art Direction by:赵全 Quan Zhao布景师 Set Decoration by:梁海山 Haishan Liang副导演/助理导演 Assistant Director:冯京 Jing Feng影片类型:喜剧国家/地区:中国香港对白语言:粤语色彩:黑白洗印格式:35 mm上映/发行日期(细节):中国香港 Hong Kong 1961年2月28日制作公司:桃源电影企业公司 [中国香港]
爱乐团
发表于3分钟前回复 :Will, a young Hispanic gay potter, is one gregarious guy. His boss is terrible, but he's got a great boyfriend and a great job. Unfortunately, behind that veneer is a dark past of violence and mental illness that he is desperate to keep hidden. When his bipolar mother comes out of the woodwork after ten years of silence, he begins exhibiting unexplainable symptoms. After an injury at work, he starts losing functioning of his arms, and something sinister lurks in the corner of his vision: a silent and ominous man in a wolf costume. Will spirals into an obsession, determined to solve this mystery of his own. What is going on with his arms? Can he trust his boyfriend? Is he becoming his mother?
三吉里绘子
发表于4分钟前回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb