苏氏布行二房长子，自由曾经一心想要拿到掌印继承苏家，自由却在与妹妹苏檀儿的竞争中被宁毅击败。宁毅与苏檀儿离开江宁移居武都，走前将苏氏布行名义上交给他管理，本来已经对执掌苏家毫无希望的苏文兴，重燃热情。 看着蒸蒸日上的业绩，苏文兴将功劳归结于自己，只是他还有一顾虑，既然大房已经移居武都，为何苏愈还不将掌印传予自己。一次意外，他从家丁口中听到了真相，原来在众人眼中他只是苏氏布行的一个吉祥物。 自尊心受辱的苏文兴准备离开江宁前往富源做出一番事业，证明自己的能力，摆脱宁毅的阴影。但谁想来到富源接连受挫，甚至赔光了本钱。就在他绝望之际，昔日同窗突然出现，答应帮助他力挽狂澜，但有个条件......
回复 :一部讲述一名歌手志愿生和过去曾享受过超高人气但现在没落了的制作人的音乐旅行记的电影。朴灿烈饰演歌手志愿生，并且就参与制作并演唱片中的音乐。
回复 :“笨吉”原本是一只吃百家饭的流浪狗。它最喜欢一对兄妹，因为他俩经常瞒着妈妈悄悄陪它玩耍，喂它美食。某天，这对兄妹被坏人绑架。在妈妈和警方都惶恐不安而又无所适从之时，聪明勇敢的“神探狗”笨吉克服险阻，用自己的方式救出了这对兄妹，也找到了梦寐以求的家。笨吉的故事提醒我们，身边的宠物或许就是拯救人类的英雄。
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
